FREDERICKA PHILLIPS CHAACHOU, PETITIONER,
v.
KHUDOURIE CHAACHOU ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1959-12-11
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and DREW, JJ., concur., ROBERTS, J., dissents.
116 So. 2d 244 Florida Supreme Court (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It now appearing to the court that an interlocutory appeal and a final appeal have been lodged in the District Court of Appeal, Third District, and that under the Constitution that court is vested with the jurisdiction to determine and hear such appeals; and it further appearing that the present certiorari is one to review an order of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, declining to transfer the cause to this court, and such procedure being unjustified by the rules of this court,

It Is, Therefore, Ordered that the said petition for certiorari is, ex mero motu, dismissed.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and DREW, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State ex rel. Lewis Roberts v. Cochran, 140 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1962)
    …County order revoking probation, then the latter order was improperly entered. We have held that the validity of air order revoking probation may be tested in a habeas corpus proceeding. Jackson v. Mayo (Fla.) 73 So. 2d 881; Senk v. Cochran (Fla.) 116 So. 2d 244. We must now determine whether a valid conviction is a condition precedent to the [*599] revocation of a probation order grounded upon a violation of so-called “Condition H”, which merely requires that the accused “must live and remain at liberty w…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw