J. C. CONNER, APPELLANT,
v.
J. TURNER BUTLER AND WILLIAM A. HALLOWES, TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1959-12-17
No. 58-94
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and. CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
116 So. 2d 454 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1959)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court vacated its prior judgment and reversed the trial court's judgment, remanding the case for a new trial as directed by the U.S. Supreme Court.


Facts & Procedural History

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Florida appellate court's affirmation of a directed verdict for the defendant, finding sufficient evidence of empl…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, by its opinion and judgment dated February 12, 1959, 109 So.2d 183, affirmed a final judgment which had been rendered in the circuit court in Dade County in common law case 37763 in favor of the defendants on a directed verdict. On cer-tiorari the U. S. Supreme Court reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the case by a per curiam order of a majority of that court, dated October 19, 1959, 80 S.Ct. 21, 22, consisting of the following:

“The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion. We hold that the proofs were sufficient to submit to the jury the question whether employer negligence played a part in producing the petitioner’s injury. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 77 S.Ct. 443, 1 L.Ed.2d 493.”

As directed by the mandate of that court filed herein December 7, 1959, it is ordered that our said judgment in the case is vacated, the trial court’s judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for new-trial.

It is further ordered that the appellate' costs in this court and the $100 costs for which the U. S. Supreme Court gave judgment to the plaintiff against the defendants shall be taxed in the trial court. See rule’ 3.16(b), F.A.R., 31 F.S.A.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and. CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw