ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. R. CO.
v.
ROBERT FRANKLIN LAMPHEAR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad was held liable for injuries to a five-year-old child who suffered severe facial disfigurement in an automobile accident caused by the railroad's negligence. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a $2,300 judgment, holding that the award was not excessive given the child's permanent scarring and suffering.
The court held that the $2,300 judgment was not excessive. The award was reasonable compensation for a child's permanent facial disfigurement, extended pain and suffering during hospitalization, and ongoing scarring visible nearly three years post-injury.
“We cannot say on the present appeal that a recovery of $2,300.00 by a five-year-old child, for his permanent facial disfigurement and the consequent pain and suffering experienced by him as the result of an injury that occasioned the necessity of twenty-six stitches to sew it up because of the fact that the whole side of his face was lying over his head so that his teeth and jaw were visible through the hole in his face, is so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience.”
The court's holding that the judgment amount was not excessive given the severity of the child's injuries
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA five-year-old child was injured in an automobile accident caused by the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad's negligence. The child suffered severe facial …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judicial Conscience cases and more on FLexlaw
— This case is controlled in its major aspects by the opinion of this Court in the companion case of Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Lamphear, 109 Fla. 25, 146 Sou. Rep. 847, in that by stipulation of the parties in the court below it was agreed that the question of liability of the defendant in this case should be determined according to the decision of the Supreme Court in the companion case, wherein liability of the railroad company in the premises -was upheld by the affirmance of the judgment in said companion case. The facts and circumstances of this case are identical with those in the companion case. The only difference is that in this case the suit was prosecuted on behalf of a five-year-old child, w;ho, as an occupant of the automobile involved in the fatal injuries considered in the other case, was injured at the same time.
We cannot say on the present appeal that a recovery of $2,300.00 by a five-year-old child, for his permanent facial disfigurement and the consequent pain and suffering experienced by him as the result of an injury that occasioned the necessity of twenty-six stitches to sew it up because of the fact that the whole side of his face was lying over his head so that his teeth and jaw were visible through the hole in his face, is so excessive as to shock the judicial conscience. The evidence shows that the plaintiff’s face did not heal for several months and that the boy suffered, to such extent that he had to take his food through a glass *219tube during the period of two weeks that he was in the hospital. It was also shown at the trial had nearly three years after the injury, that an ugly scar still remained on the boy’s face and had the appearance of being permanent.
So the judgment must be affirmed and it is so ordered.
Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, P. J., and Buford, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.