RICHARD G. WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court discharged a prisoner who had served more than the maximum allowable sentence for issuing a worthless check, as defined by state law at the time of his sentencing.
Yes, the sentence was excessive. The maximum sentence for issuing a worthless check, when nothing of value was received, was ninety days under the applicable statute.
“In State ex rel. Shargaa v. Culver, Fla.1959, 113 So. 2d 383, this Court held that the issuance of a worthless check constitutes a misdemeanor punishable under Section 775.07, F.S.A., and therein delineated in detail the reasons for such holding.”
Establishes the legal precedent for classifying the offense and its punishment.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner Richard G. Williams was convicted of issuing a worthless check on April 3, 1958, and sentenced to three years in prison on May 26, 1958. At…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Excessive Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
The respondent has filed a return to the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued in this cause and the Court has duly considered said return and finding therefrom and from the copies of the information on file in said cause under which petitioner was convicted that he was adjudged guilty of issuing a worthless check on April 3, 1958 and sentenced on May 26, 1958 to serve three years in the State penitentiary.
In State ex rel. Shargaa v. Culver, Fla.1959, 113 So.2d 383, this Court held that the issuance of a worthless check constitutes a misdemeanor punishable under Section 775.07, F.S.A., and therein delineated in detail the reasons for such holding. In Greer v. Culver, Fla.1959, 113 So.2d 386 we reaffirmed said holding and discharged the petitioner in that case from custody because of an excessive sentence. It should be noted that such sentence was imposed upon the petitioner in this case by the learned circuit judge prior to the rendition of the opinions of this Court in the above entitled cases.
Under Section 775.07, in effect at the time of the adjudication of guilt and sentencing of petitioner, the maximum sentence which could have been imposed was ninety days, inasmuch as the record shows that nothing of value was received for said check. It appearing from this record that the petitioner has served far in excess of such maximum sentence, it is
Ordered that the petitioner be forthwith discharged from custody.
It is so ordered.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOBSON, ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State of Fla. ex rel. B. "Babe" Shargaa v. Culver, 113 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 1959)
- Greer v. Culver, 113 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1959)