NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, LLC AND NHS MANAGEMENT, LLC, APPELLANTS,
v.
ESTATE OF GERTRUDE R. CHAMPAGNE BY AND THROUGH GLORIA OLSEN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, APPELLEE.

Fla. 5th DCA | 2018-04-13
No. Case No. 5D17–2693
239 So. 3d 1293 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a provision in an arbitration agreement requiring application of Alabama Rules of Evidence to admissibility of evidence at arbitration is against public policy and severable, while a provision for Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure for pre-hearing discovery is not problematic.


Facts & Procedural History

Northport Health Services appealed the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration with the estate of Gertrude Champagne. The arbitration…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WALLIS, J.

WALLIS, J.

Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC d/b/a West Melbourne Health and Rehabilitation Center, appeals the trial court's order denying Northport's motion to compel arbitration with Gloria Olsen, as personal representative of the Estate of Gertrude R. Champagne.

We have recently addressed the enforceability of an identical arbitration agreement in Northport Health Services of Florida, LLC v. Louis, 240 So.3d 120 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 2, 2018). We held in Louis that the provision requiring Alabama's Rules of Evidence to control the admissibility of evidence at arbitration was against public policy, and that the provision was severable because it concerns procedure. Id. at ---- at D506. However, we also held that the provision requiring the application of Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure to the parties' conduct of pre-hearing discovery does not violate public policy because no convincing argument was raised as to why the application is problematic. Id.

Here, the parties raise essentially the same arguments. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to the trial court to grant Northport's motion to compel and to sever from the arbitration agreement the provision applying the Alabama Rules of Evidence to the admissibility of evidence at the arbitration hearing. Id.; see also Hancock v. Northport Health Servs. of Fla., LLC, 150 So.3d 1262, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (affirming an order compelling arbitration of an identical arbitration agreement).

REVERSED and REMANDED, with Instructions.

SAWAYA and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw