LELIA S. DEAN, APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE W. DEAS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves a procedural history where an initial affirmance by the District Court of Appeal was returned for reconsideration by the Supreme Court. After the Supreme Court's further consideration, the District Court of Appeal ordered its original mandate of affirmance to issue.
The District Court of Appeal ordered its original mandate of affirmance to issue, indicating that further reconsideration was not warranted or that the Supreme Court's directive did not alter the outcome.
“By per curiam order the judgment appealed from in this cause was affirmed by this court without opinion.”
Establishes the initial action taken by the District Court of Appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe District Court of Appeal initially affirmed a judgment without opinion. The appellant petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, alleging confli…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
By per curiam order the judgment appealed from in this cause was affirmed by this court without opinion. Fla.App., 110 So.2d 730. Thereafter appellant petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari on the alleged ground that our disposition of the appeal was in conflict with former decisions of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court refused to issue the writ of certiorari, Fla., 114 So.2d 439 but on petition for rehearing entered a per curiam decision, Fla., 116 So.2d 23 returning jurisdiction of the cause to this court for further consideration in light of a holding by the Supreme Court in a case rendered by it *248subsequent to the entry of our order of affirmance. Certiorari having been denied by the Supreme Court it is ordered that the mandate on our order of affirmance do now issue.
WIGGINTON, Chief Judge, and STUR-GIS and CARROLL, DONALD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dean v. Deas, 122 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 1960)…Certiorari dismissed without written opinion. 118 So. 2d 247.…
Authorities Cited
- Lelia S. Dean v. Deas, 116 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 1959)
- Dean v. Deas, 114 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1959)
- City OF Miami v. Graham, 110 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
- Lelia S. Dean v. Deas, 110 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)