C. M. DUNHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
PAN AMERICAN BANK OF MIAMI, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1960-01-20
No. 1340
118 So. 2d 264 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court

An examination of the record discloses that the notice of appeal was not timely filed in accordance with the provisions of Rule 3.2b, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. It is, therefore,

CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal in this cause commenced by Notice of Appeal filed in the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Florida, on May 26, 1959, be and the same is hereby dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Tr. Under Will of Grace E. Walker v. The First Nat'l Bank IN ST. Petersburg, 143 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
    …8 F.S.A.; Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(b), 31 F.S.A.; Blount v. Hansen, Fla.1961, 133 So. 2d 73; Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 648; Albert v. Carey, Fla.App.1960, 120 So. 2d 189; Dunham v. Pan American Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1960, 118 So. 2d 264; Braunstein v. Silhouette, Inc., Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 436; Harris v. Condermann, Fla.App.1959, 113 So. 2d 235. KANNER, Acting C. J.,- and WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.…
  • Am. Cas. Co. of Reading v. PAN Am. Bank OF Miami, 156 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
    …District, on its own motion, entered an order dismissing the appeal, setting forth as grounds therefor that the said notice of appeal was not timely filed in accordance with the provisions of Rule 3.2(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. Fla.App., 118 So. 2d 264. Thereafter, Dunham, by writ of certiorari took the case to the Florida Supreme Court, but that court denied his petition. Fla., 122 So. 2d 402. Then, on motion of Pan American Bank of Miami, the circuit court judge issued a Rule to Show Cause direc…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw