HELEN T. KAEMMERLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES F. KAEMMERLEN, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
C. ROWLAND SHANNON AND SARAH P. SHANNON, APPELLEES
HELEN T. KAEMMERLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES F. KAEMMERLEN, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
C. ROWLAND SHANNON AND SARAH P. SHANNON, APPELLEES
119 So. 2d 315
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is not from the final decree, but from the order denying the petition for rehearing. The appeal will have to be dismissed ex mero motu. Finley v. Finley, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 191; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App., 1959, 110 So.2d 73.
Appeal dismissed.
ALLEN, C. J., and KANNER and SHANNON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Eve Postell v. State, 383 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…f the incorrect reasons assigned for the ruling. Congregation Temple De Hirsch v. Aronson, 128 So. 2d 585 (Fla.1961); Green v. Bruns, 102 So. 2d 610 (Fla.1958); Moore v. City of St. Petersburg, 281 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Leavstrom v. Muston, 119 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). Postell was, in fact, ineligible for classification as a youthful offender because she did not meet the separate requirement of subsection (a) of Section 958.04(1), that is, she was not a person “. . . who has been transferred fo…
-
Armand G. Morin v. Halpern, 139 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…on on motion for a new trial is clothed with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Kraus v. Osteen, Fla.App.1962, 135 So. 2d 885; Leavstrom v. Muston, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 315; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So. 2d 669. A jury verdict likewise should not be disturbed unless upon an inspection of the entire record, in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the' verdict was rendered, it is clearly apparent th…
-
City OF Clearwater v. McCLURY, 157 So. 2d 545 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…on on motion for a new trial is clothed with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Kraus v. Osteen, Fla.App.1962, 135 So. 2d 885; Leavstrom v. Muston, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 315; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 669.” In the case of Roth v. Calvert Fire Insurance Company, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 49, the court said: “(2) * * * Trial courts are allowed a very broad and liberal discretion in the matter of granting a ne…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- McNARY v. Hudson, 110 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
- Williams v. Levine, 103 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1958)
- Finley v. Coralee Russell Finley, 103 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1958)