JOSEPH PATRICK MANNING, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

Citator

Cited By

• Thorne v. State, 271 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
• Teachman v. State, 264 So. 3d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
  …than the accused, unless it is established in camera that the evidence is relevant to consent by a similar pattern of conduct, or that the accused is not the source of semen, pregnancy, injury, or disease. § 794.022, Fla. Stat.; Gomez v. State, 245 So. 3d 950, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). The rape shield law does not exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible under the Florida Evidence Code; instead, section 794.022 is a codification of Florida’s relevance rules as applied to the sexual behavio…
• Blow v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D665 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)
  …he plain text of the statute makes clear that the instances of a victim’s prior sexual history excluded from evidence are those that are (i) consensual and (ii) between the victim and any person other than the defendant on trial. See Gomez v. State, 245 So. 3d 950, 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018); McLean v. State, 754 So. 2d 176, 182 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (“The Rape Shield Statute . . . prohibits evidence of specific instances of prior consensual activity between the victim and any person other than the offender in sexu…

Authorities Cited

• Smiley v. State, 966 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2007)