J.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.
J.D., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.
246 So. 3d 569
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2018)
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Beasley v. State, 774 So.2d 649, 657 (Fla. 2000) (observing: "In moving for a judgment of acquittal, a defendant 'admits not only the facts stated in the evidence adduced, but also admits every conclusion favorable to the adverse party that a jury might fairly and reasonably infer from the evidence' ") (quoting Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla. 1974) ); State v. Rodriguez, 71 So.3d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (observing that when a defendant moves for a judgment of acquittal based upon insufficiency of the evidence, all reasonable inferences and conclusions that may be drawn from the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lynch v. State, 293 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1974)
- Beasley v. State, 774 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 2000)
- State v. Abel Rodriguez, 71 So. 3d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)