LAWRENCE B. CONE, APPELLANT,
v.
NOLA CONE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1960-04-28
No. 60-68
120 So. 2d 244 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1960) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cone v. Nola Cone, 132 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
    …[*613] rendered subsequent to the final decree of divorce. In all other respects, the decree is affirmed. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 461. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.App.1960, 120 So. 2d 244.…
  • Cone v. Nola Cone, 142 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
    …ess the “law of the case.” For the reasons stated, it would appear that the order appealed from should be reversed and the cause remanded for the purpose expressed above. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 461. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.App.1960, 120 So. 2d 244. . Cone v. Cone, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 611. . This provision of the rule is new, having been added July 1, 1957. See Authors’ Comment, 31 F.S.A., pocket part, p. 84.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw