WILLIAMS

v.

HULSEY

Citator

Cited By

• Thomson McKINNON Sec., Inc. v. Kerrean Slater, 615 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …Reynolds, 117 So. 2d 16, 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959) (in order for a defense of res judicata to prevail, the final judgment relied upon must reflect within its four corners that it was on the merits and is conclusive as to the second suit), cert. denied, 120 So. 2d 616 (Fla.1960); Equitable Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Bradford Builders, Inc., 174 So. 2d 44, 45 (Fla. 3d DCA) (“To support a defense of res judicata, it must be clear that the court in the previous action intended that the disposition there was to be wit…
• Am. Emp'rs' Ins. Co. v. Piedmont Sewing Supply, Inc., 287 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
  …t by the defendant, a conditional vendee. In essence, plaintiff’s special interest was the unpaid balance of the contract, to-wit $8,000. See Huckleberry v. Davis Double Seal Jalousies, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 117 So. 2d 519, at 521, cert. denied, Fla., 120 So. 2d 616. Therefore, in accordance with Fla.Stat. § 78.19, F.S.A., set out in part hereinabove, the final judgment of default should have provided that the writ of execution upon application by the plaintiff Piedmont be issued for only the amount of Piedmont…
• Aviation Invs., Inc. v. Cameron, 350 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …on as constructive notice need not be considered. . Cf. 7 C..T.S. Attachment §§ 282-283, p. 470. . We need not decide whether the Ken might also have terminated. See Huckleberry v. Davis Double Seal Jalousies, Inc., Fla.App., 117 So. 2d 519, Fla., 120 So. 2d 616. . 11 U.S.C.A. § 110 sub. a. . 11 U.S.C.A. § 110, sub. c.…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. Hulsey, 115 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)