LINDA M. SANDS, APPELLANT,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, APPELLEE.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the foreclosure judgment but reversed the attorney's fees award for lack of evidentiary support and remanded for a hearing on the reasonableness of fees.
A trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing with attorney testimony to determine the reasonableness of attorney's fees in a foreclosure judgment.
[1] Attorney's fees in foreclosure actions must be supported by an evidentiary hearing where the trial court determines the reasonableness of the rate and time claimed, not b…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“reversal in part is required because the amount awarded for attorney's fees was not supported by testimony from an attorney regarding the work done in this case”
Appellee's acknowledgment that the fee award lacked proper evidentiary support
Linda Sands appealed a final foreclosure judgment entered against her in favor of Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, challenging both the bank's st…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reasonableness Of Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
*360Appellant, Linda Sands, appeals the Final Judgment of Foreclosure entered in favor of Appellee, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. Appellant alleges that Appellee lacked standing to foreclose and failed to present competent, substantial evidence to support the amount awarded in the Final Judgment. Appellee acknowledges that reversal in part is required because the amount awarded for attorney's fees was not supported by testimony from an attorney regarding the work done in this case. Therefore, we reverse the amount awarded in attorney's fees and remand with instructions to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine the reasonableness of the rate and time claimed. See Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA, 185 So.3d 700, 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (reversing portion of final judgment awarding attorney's fees where attorney's fees affidavit filed before trial was insufficient to support fee award and trial court failed to hold evidentiary hearing); Newman v. Newman, 121 So.3d 661, 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reversing award of attorney's fees where court failed to hold hearing and allow appellant opportunity to dispute reasonableness of rate and time claimed). We affirm without discussion the remaining issues on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nicholas v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)
Authorities Cited
- Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, 185 So. 3d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
- Newman v. Newman, 121 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)