IN RE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES
IN RE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES
122 So. 2d 7
Florida Supreme Court (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Florida Appellate Rule 6.4, 31 F.S.A., be and the same is hereby amended by striking out the words “of $25.00” and inserting in lieu thereof the words “in the amount prescribed by law”.
This rule shall be effective upon being filed in the office of the Clerk.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, DREW, THORNAL and O’CON-NELL, JJ., concur.'
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Petition of William B. Dawson, III, 131 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 1961)…her well exemplified by some of our prior decisions and certain general authorities. See In re Stoller, 160 Fla. 769, 36 So. 2d 443; In re Lathero, 157 Fla. 630, 26 So. 2d 667; In re Hurtenbach, 157 Fla. 871, 27 So. 2d 348; In re McGregor, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 7; 7 C.J.S. Attorney and Client § 41; 5 Am.Jur., Attorney at Law, Section 301. In sum, the authorities which we have cited suggest the basic elements which should be covered in the showing to be made by the petitioner. While these are not exclusive,…
-
Petition of Joseph L. Wolf, 257 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1972)…her well exemplified by some of our prior decisions and certain general authorities. See In re Stoller, 160 Fla. 769, 36 So. 2d 443; In re Lathero, 157 Fla. 630, 26 So. 2d 667; In re Hurtenbach, 157 Fla. 871, 27 So. 2d 348; In re McGregor, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 7; 7 C.J.S. Attorney and Client § 41; 5 Am.Jur., Attorney at Law, Section 301. “In sum, the authorities which we have cited suggest the basic elements which should be covered in the showing to be made by the petitioner. While these are not exclusive,…