CHARLES E. MARTIN, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCES M. MARTIN, APPELLEE
CHARLES E. MARTIN, APPELLANT,
FRANCES M. MARTIN, APPELLEE
122 So. 2d 209
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
A motion for attorneys’ fees has been filed for services of the appellee’s attorneys in this court, which is hereby granted in the amount of $200.00.
ALLEN, C. J., SHANNON, J., and WILLIAMS, VOLIE A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schneider v. Gustafson Indus., Inc., 139 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 1962)…ssion shall dismiss * * (Emphasis supplied.) . Sec. 59.27, F.S.A., and implementing rules. Decisions under current F.A.R. 3.6, 31 F.S.A. are not conclusive on the point of strict compliance with its time provisions. See Ward v. Fountain, Fla.App., 122 So. 2d 209, relied upon by the Commission in this ease; Graham v. Thornton, Fla.App.1958, 104 So. 2d 95; Nitsos v. Carlisle, Fla.App.1958, 104 So. 2d 144; Axtell v. Lyons, Fla.App.1958, 105 So. 2d 610. . Fagan v. Robbins (1928), 96 Fla. 91, 117 So. 863; Reid…
-
Chandler v. Fla. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 546 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…the total circumstances surrounding appellant’s contention of good cause for not dismissing, as well as what is contained in his sworn affidavit. We distinguish the two cases which Florida Farm Bureau has urged us to consider. In Ward v. Fountain, 122 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), an appeal was taken from a judgment of the circuit court. The appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the appellant had failed to file a record on appeal. The appellate court granted the motion. On rehearing the ap…