SANDS BURY LEE, PETITIONER,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
SANDS BURY LEE, PETITIONER,
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
122 So. 2d 466
Florida Supreme Court (1960)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
This case has now been thoroughly considered on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the respondent’s return.
It appears that the petitioner’s claim for release on Habeas Corpus is unfounded, therefore the writ issued 10 May 1960 is discharged.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, PIOB-SON, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., .concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Shriners Hosps. FOR Crippled Child. v. Zrillic, 563 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 1990)…ppeal dismissed, 323 U.S. 666, 65 S.Ct. 49, 89 L.Ed. 541 (1944); see also In re Estate of Greenberg, 390 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla.1980) (following Taylor), appeal dismissed, 450 U.S. 961, 101 S.Ct. 1475, 67 L.Ed.2d 610 (1981); In re Estate of Blankenship, 122 So. 2d 466, 469 (Fla.1960) (following Taylor); Arthritis Foundation v. Beisse, 456 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (following Taylor), review denied, 467 So. 2d 999 (Fla.1985). The plain meaning of the language of the Florida Constitution compels us to conclude…1 / 2
-
Capella v. City OF Gainesville, 377 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1979)…it amended section 171.0415(9), Florida Statutes (Supp.1974), by deleting the words “any part,” did not intend to allow the annexation of a portion of the area previously proposed for annexation within a two-year period. In re Blankenship’s Estate, 122 So. 2d 466, 469 (Fla.1960). Capella next contends that since chapter 77-557 does not specifically authorize the City’s enactment of an annexation ordinance, the City exceeded its authority and the ordinance it enacted is unconstitutional. This contention is w…
-
In re Est. of Helen D. Lubbe v. Kamoraski, 142 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)…will is nevertheless revoked by it. See and compare Crawford’s Estate v. Crawford, 1955, 225 Miss. 208, 82 So. 2d 823, 59 A.L.R.2d 1; In re Melville’s Estate, 1914, 245 Pa. 318, 91 A. 679, 681, L.R.A.1916C, 98. In re Blankenship’s Estate, Fla.1960, 122 So. 2d 466, was decided after the amendment to § 731.19. In that case the decedent executed several successive wills, the last two of which were executed within six months prior to his death. Each of the wills contained substantially the same charitable beques…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence