JULIUS MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
LOIS MILLER SHULMAN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida courts must give full faith and credit to accrued payments under a foreign divorce decree unless the rendering state's law allows modification of accrued installments.
The defendant appealed a Florida final decree ordering him to pay $8,650 in child support and medical expenses accrued under a Wisconsin divorce decre…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Modification Of Decree cases and more on FLexlaw
This is the second appearance of this cause in this court. See Shulman v. Miller, Fla.App.1958, 107 So.2d 274.
The appellant husband, defendant below, seeks review of a final decree and an amendment to the final decree entered subsequent to the entry of a decree pro con-fesso. By the terms of the final decree, the chancellor provided in part:
“ * * * that defendant Julius Miller, now residing at Green Bay, Wisconsin, be and he hereby is required and directed to pay to plaintiff Lois Miller Shulman forthwith the sum of $8,650 for child support and medical expenses accrued under and pursuant to the terms of the judgment rendered by the Circuit Court for Brown County, Wisconsin, and in arrears at the commencement of this action, * * * ft
The arrearage of $8,650, together with other sums awarded were reduced to a money judgment by the decree.
*590The amendment to the final decree modified the final decree to the extent that the defendant was credited with the sum of $250 per month for the period of time that he provided support and maintenance for the minor son of the parties elsewhere than with the plaintiff.
Having heard argument of counsel and upon consideration of the record and brief submitted, we conclude that only one point raised by the appellant requires discussion, i. e., whether or not the chancellor erred in the entry of a final judgment for arrearages based upon the foreign divorce decree. By the terms of the foreign decree of divorce, the defendant was ordered to pay for support of the two minor children of the parties in the sum of $37.50 each per month and was further ordered to pay all medical 'expenses of said children. Upon stipulation of the parties, this decree was amended in May, 1951, whereby the defendant was ordered to pay as support for the minor children the sum of $115 per month for the months of June, July and August, 1951, and the sum of $125 per month commencing in September, 1951, and thereafter until further order of the court. The plaintiff in the second count of her complaint sought past due support and medical bills which had been awarded by the Wisconsin decree. The appellant contends that Florida courts cannot enter a judgment respecting past due installments of support money which have not been reduced to judgment in the courts of the rendering sister state, and relies upon Sackler v. Sackler, Fla.1950, 47 So.2d 292, 18 A.L.R.2d 856. He further points out that there is no evidence in the record to indicate that such past due installments had been reduced to judgment in the State of Wisconsin.
The rule appears to be well settled in this jurisdiction that foreign divorce decrees providing for alimony and support money are entitled to full faith and credit in Florida, to the extent that payments thereunder are accrued, unless the law of the state where the decree is rendered is such that said decree may be modified as to accrued installments. Boyer v. Andrews, 143 Fla. 462, 196 So. 825; Cohen v. Cohen, 158 Fla. 802, 30 So.2d 307; Wolk v. Leak, Fla.1954, 70 So.2d 498; and see Watson v. McDowell, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 680. It appears to be equally settled by these authorities that in a suit to enforce accrued installments, the burden is upon the party defending the suit to make it appear that under the law of the state of rendition, installments for alimony or child support do not become vested when they are due but are subject at all times to amendment, change or alteration. “In the absence of a showing of any law to the contrary in the sister state, a decree final in form is presumed to be absolute and irrevocable.” Boyer v. Andrews, supra [143 Fla. 462, 196 So. 828], There is nothing in the pleadings or otherwise in the record of this cause to show that the appellant relied upon any Wisconsin law providing for increasing or reducing the amount .of the support payments after they became due. The absence from the record of both pleading and proof of foreign law precludes our consideration of this contention raised for the first time in appellant’s brief. Kingston v. Quimby, Fla. 1955, 80 So.2d 455. Nor does the uniform judicial notice of foreign law act, § 92.031, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., apply since it does not act automatically. See Aboandandolo v. Vonella, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 282.
Other questions raised by appellant have been considered but found to be without merit.
The decree appealed is affirmed.
PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Movielab, Inc. v. Davis, 217 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…etations of this statute as given by the appellate courts of this State. See: Lanigan v. Lanigan, Fla.1955, 78 So. 2d 92; Kingston v. Quimby, Fla.1955, 80 So. 2d 455; Aboandandolo v. Vonella, Fla.1956, 88 So. 2d 282; Miller v. Shulman, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 589; Hieber v. Hieber, Fla.App.1963, 151 So. 2d 646; Cordrey v. Cordrey, Fla.App.1968, 206 So. 2d 234. In Lanigan v. Lanigan, supra, the following is found: “While this court and the lower court are required to take judicial notice of the ‘common law a…1 / 3
-
Hieber v. Hieber, 151 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)…e is to be relied upon as governing a given transaction it must be pleaded and proved as any other issue of fact, for the local courts will not take judicial notice of it. Kingston v. Quimby, Fla.1955, 80 So. 2d 455; Miller v. Shulman, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 589. In Hagen v. Viney, 124 Fla. 747, 169 So. 391, our Supreme Court said: “It is quite true that the lex loci contractus governs the construction of this as it does all contracts, but the separation agreement sued on is valid in this state, and, bein…
-
AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Ciarrochi, 573 So. 2d 990 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…. Where the law of a foreign forum is claimed to be dispositional, yet no foreign law is pleaded to the trial court, the matter is to be determined by the law of this forum. See Coyne v. Coyne, 325 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Miller v. Shulman, 122 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). Further, the choice of law doctrine presumes that, “where a party seeking to rely upon foreign law fails to demonstrate that the foreign law is different from the law in Florida, the law is the same as Florida.” Gustafson v. Je…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Boyer v. Andrews, 143 Fla. 462 (Fla. 1940)
- Kingston v. Quimby, 80 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1955)
- Renzo Aboandandolo v. Vonella, 88 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 1956)
- Cohen v. Cohen, 158 Fla. 802 (Fla. 1947)
- Josie Lee Watson v. McDOWELL, 110 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
- Wolk v. Leak, 70 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1954)
- Shulman v. Miller, 107 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)