SUBIC BAY MARINE EXPLORATORIUM, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JV CHINA, INC., APPELLEE.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida corporation is subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts, regardless of its principal place of business or where the dispute arose.
[1] A domestic Florida corporation is subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts.
[2] A court's personal jurisdiction inquiry focuses on the defendant's relationship to the forum state.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSBMEI sued JV China for breach of a stock subscription agreement. JV China, a Florida corporation, moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse State Of Incorporation cases and more on FLexlaw
Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, Inc. ("SBMEI") appeals the dismissal of its amended complaint. It argues that the trial court erred in ruling that it lacked personal jurisdiction over JV China, Inc. ("JV China"). SBMEI contends that by being a domestic Florida corporation, JV China is subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts. We agree and reverse.
JV China is a Florida corporation. It was incorporated in Florida in 1996, and has remained an active Florida corporation ever since. Though JV China is a Florida corporation, it maintains its principal place of business in California and conducts much of its business overseas.
The present dispute arises out of a stock subscription agreement, under which JV China agreed to purchase one million shares of SBMEI stock. After JV China allegedly failed to pay the balance owed for the shares, SBMEI filed this action. In turn, JV China moved to dismiss SBMEI's amended complaint, contending the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The trial court agreed and dismissed SBMEI's amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, concluding that SBMEI "failed to establish that JV China was subject to jurisdiction under Florida's long-arm statute."1
*1141SBMEI argues that the trial court erred in dismissing its amended complaint because as a domestic Florida corporation, JV China is subject to the jurisdiction of Florida's courts. Personal jurisdiction denotes a court's ability to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant, whether it is an individual or a corporate entity. Borden v. E.-European Ins. Co., 921 So.2d 587, 591 (Fla. 2006). The primary focus of a court's personal jurisdiction inquiry is the defendant's relationship to the forum state. Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Super. Ct. of Cal., San Francisco Cty., --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 1773, 1779, 198 L.Ed.2d 395 (2017). General jurisdiction over a defendant, meaning that a defendant can be required to answer any claim that arose anywhere in the world, requires that the defendant be "essentially at home" in the forum state. See Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). For an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction is the individual's domicile; for a corporation, it is an equivalent place, one in which the corporation is fairly regarded as at home. Id. at 924, 131 S.Ct. 2846.
Florida residents are subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts. Patten v. Mokher, 134 Fla. 433, 184 So. 29, 30 (1938). Under Florida law, corporations are residents of their state of incorporation. Fowler v. Chillingworth, 94 Fla. 1, 113 So. 667, 669 (1927) ; see, e.g., Gay v. Bessemer Props., 159 Fla. 729, 32 So.2d 587, 591 (1947) (holding plaintiff was resident of Delaware, where it was incorporated). Consequently, corporations incorporated under Florida law are Florida residents, subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida's courts. See 18 Am. Jur. 2d Corporations § 67 (2018) (indicating for personal jurisdiction purposes, corporation is citizen of state where it was created).
Here, the trial court did not consider JV China's Florida residency. Instead, it applied section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2016), Florida's long-arm statute, which establishes when Florida courts may exercise jurisdiction over non-Florida residents. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 500 (Fla. 1989) (recognizing that long-arm jurisdiction statute sets forth legislature's determination as to "requisite basis for obtaining jurisdiction over nonresident defendants as far as Florida is concerned") (emphasis added). Such an analysis is unnecessary when dealing with a domestic corporation.
For these reasons, we conclude the trial court erred in determining that it lacked personal jurisdiction over JV China, as it is a Florida corporation. Thus, we reverse the trial court's dismissal of SBMEI's amended complaint.2
REVERSED and REMANDED.
TORPY and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Builders Ins. Co RRG, Inc. v. Carrollton Premiere Roofing, Inc. (M.D. Fla. 2025)…rown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011) (noting that a corporate defendant's place of incorporation and/or principal place of business constitutes the "paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction"); Subic Bay Marine Expl., Inc. v. JV China, Inc., 257 So. 3d 1139, 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018) (“[C]orporations incorporated 10 ---PAGE 11--- Case 8:22-cv-02959-VMC-CPT Document 46 Filed 07/02/25 Page 11 of 18 PageID 607 under Florida law are Florida residents, subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida's…
-
Netto v. Nationwide Express Carrier Corp. (S.D. Fla. 2025)…Fla. July 9, 2021) (finding that the court had jurisdiction over the corporate defendant because it was a Florida corporation with its principal place of 10 ---PAGE 10--- business in Florida); Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, Inc. v. JV China, Inc., 257 So. 3d 1139, 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (“Florida residents are subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts. Under Florida law, corporations are residents of their state of incorporation." (internal citation omitted)). For purposes of the instant motio…
-
Betancourt v. Buggy Techs. Inc (S.D. Fla. 2024)…WL 2895741 (M.D. Fla. July 9, 2021) (finding that the court had jurisdiction over the corporate defendant because it was a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida); Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, Inc. v. JV China, Inc., 257 So. 3d 1139, 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (“Florida residents are subject to the general jurisdiction of Florida courts. Under Florida law, corporations are residents of their state of incorporation." (internal citation omitted)). ---PAGE 8--- In sum, Plaintiff ha…
Authorities Cited
- Venetian Salami Co. v. J.S. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1989)
- Borden v. East-European Ins. Co., 921 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 2006)
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations v. Brown et ux., 564 U.S. 915 (U.S. 2011)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., 137 S. Ct. 1773 (U.S. 2017)
- Mabelle E. Fowler and Her Husband v. Honorable C. E. Chillingworth, 94 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1927)
- Patten v. Mokher, 134 Fla. 433 (Fla. 1938)
- City OF Jacksonville v. Nichols Eng'g & Research Corp., 159 Fla. 729 (Fla. 1947)
- GAY v. Bessemer Props., 159 Fla. 729 (Fla. 1947)
- Patriotcom, Inc. v. Vega, 821 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Gioria Y. Singer v. Unibilt Dev. Co., 43 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)