WALLACE E. ILLGEN, APPELLANT,
v.
ELOISE CARTER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A mother cannot declare a child conceived during wedlock to be illegitimate, even if the child is born after divorce.
The plaintiff sued to establish paternity, testifying the defendant was the father but that she conceived the child while married to another man. The …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Legitimacy cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellee, as plaintiff below, filed an action under the bastardy statute, F.S.A. § 742.01 et seq. seeking to establish that the appellant, defendant below, is the father of her child bom October 18, 1956.
The plaintiff testified that the defendant was the father of her child; that she was divorced on February 21, 1956, from her former husband; but that she became pregnant while she was still married.
The defendant denied having intercourse with the plaintiff and, of course, his contention was that the father of the child was the former husband of the plaintiff.
The facts in this case are very similar to those in the case of Sanders v. Yancey, Fla. App.1960, 122 So.2d 202, 205. In that opinion this court discussed at length the effect of testimony by a mother which would have the effect of rendering illegitimate a child that was conceived and born in wedlock. We, in our opinion, said:
“After a careful consideration of the cases cited herein along with the dictates of sound moral public policy, we conclude the rule in Florida to be that a mother is not permitted to have a child which has been conceived in wedlock declared to be illegitimate. Children which are conceived and born in lawful wedlock are legitimate. Likewise, children conceived during lawful wedlock are not rendered illegitimate by the subsequent dissolution of the marriage by death or divorce before the birth of the child. 4 Vernier American Family Laws, sec. 240. See also section 65.05, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides that a decree of divorce shall not render illegitimate the children ‘born during the marriage’ except when it is rendered upon the ground set forth in sec. 65.03(9) that states where either party had a husband or wife at the time of the marriage sought to be annulled.”
This case is reversed for further action by the lower court not inconsistent with this opinion.
ALLEN, C. J., KANNER, J., and SPOTO, I. C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Wise, 234 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)…rom reversed. . “Any unmarried woman who shall be pregnant or delivered of a bastard child, may bring proceedings in the circuit court, in chancery, to determine the paternity of such child.” . See also, so holding, Illgen v. Carter, Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 368; Kennelly v. Davis, Fla.App.1968, 216 So. 2d 795; aff’d. Kennelly v. Davis, Fla.1969, 221 So. 2d 415, cert. den. 396 Ü.S. 916, 90 S.Ct. 237, 24 L.Ed.2d 193. In the last fiited ease, the Supreme Court of Florida said: “The study of the eases and the…
-
Ilona Marita Lorenz v. Jiminez, 163 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…d complaint did not reveal the marital status of the plaintiff. Unless the child was born to her out of wedlock, the plaintiff had no cause of action under the statute. Sanders v. Yancey, Fla.App.1960, 122 So. 2d 202; Illgen v. Carter, Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 368. Appellant argues that if her complaint is held to be deficient the cause should be remanded with directions to allow the filing of an amended complaint. The record reveals no request made below for leave to amend, or a denial by the chancellor of…
Authorities Cited
- Sanders v. Yancey, 122 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)