STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. PRINCESS GRIFFIN, PETITIONER,

v.

GEORGE E. SCHULZ, JUDGE OF CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• W.F. Yost v. Rieve Enters., Inc., 461 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …s. Hauer v. Thum, 67 So. 2d 643 (Fla.1953). There is no bar to applying the doctrine of unclean hands to a case in which both the plaintiff and the defendant are parties to a fraudulent transaction perpetrated on a third party. See Faber v. Landman, 123 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Hauer v. Thum. In that there was evidence from which the trial court could have found that Stirrett himself was a party to the fraud, it is therefore immaterial whether Stirrett himself had knowledge of the fact that the premises…
• Pennington v. Pennington, 390 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …his omission. Appellant even paid the increased child support despite her refusal to convey. Generally, the conduct constituting the “unclean hands” must be connected with the matter in litigation and must affect the adverse party. Faber v. Landman, 123 So. 2d 405 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). Here, the matter in litigation was the requirement of the agreement that the wife convey her interest and not the improper payment of child support. While the husband’s failure to pay the child support through the court may have…
• Deal v. Migoski, 122 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)
  …ased and postponed the enjoyment of the advantage. The principle of clean hands requires a plaintiff to be free of any inequitable conduct relative to the controversy. See cases cited at 12 Fla.Jur., Equity § 55. See Faber v. Landman, Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 405. There are some recognized limitations to this principle. 2 Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence, § 399 (5th ed. 1941), and cases cited therein. The relation of attorney and client is one of the most important as well as one of the most sacred relations k…