ORLOWITZ

v.

ORLOWITZ

Citator

Cited By

• In re the Est. OF Chad Starling. Dewayne Y. Starling & Wilma C. Starling v. Asis Saha and Barbara Saha, 451 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …ontractor creates an inherently dangerous condition that may be found to be an attractive nuisance, the independent contractor status does not insulate the employer from liability. See Fouraker v. Mullis, 120 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 123 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1960). Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment as to Count I; and we reverse the dismissal of Count II. AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART. DAUKSCH, J., concurs. FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur in part; dissent in part…
• Johnson v. Girtman, 542 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …14 So. 2d 151 (Fla.1975). The validity of a contract to make or keep a will in force is measured by general contract law. Exchange Nat’l Bank v. Bryan, 122 Fla. 479, 165 So. 685 (1936); Martel v. Carlson, 118 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 123 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1960). Here, there is no dispute as to the clarity of the Agreement’s terms. Further, the conveyance of property constitutes valid consideration. Manchester v. Loomis, 191 Iowa 554, 181 N.W. 415 (1921). The appellant argues, however, that the A…
• Santa FE Dev. Corp. v. Guitannie Randolph, 506 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …466 So. 2d 1133, 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Curr v. Helene Transp. Corp., 287 So. 2d 695, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Schield Bantum Co. v. Greif, 161 So. 2d 266, 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Martel v. Carlson, 118 So. 2d 592, 594 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 123 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1960). Second, we see no error in denying the defendant Santa Fe’s motion for directed verdict in this cause. Abundant evidence was adduced below to establish that Santa Fe, as owner, directly influenced the manner of construction in the const…