IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RELATING TO ADMISSION TO THE FLORIDA BAR
IN RE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RELATING TO ADMISSION TO THE FLORIDA BAR
124 So. 2d 706
Florida Supreme Court (1960)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Subparagraph a of Section 22 of Article IV of the foregoing rules, 31 F.S.A. be and the same is hereby amended by inserting immediately following the words “in-residence college work” in the third line of the printed rule the words “or its equivalent” and adding to said Section 22a at the end thereof the following sentence: “This section shall be applicable only to those applying for admission to the Bar who enroll in any accredited Law College subsequent to December 31, 1960. All other applicants shall be governed by previous Section 22a of Article IV of the rules aforesaid.”
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Schiffman, 144 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 1962)…owever, it must be admitted that the above language is misleading, standing alone, for in that case there had been an award benefiting the claimant. This Court set aside an award of attorneys’ fees in Southeastern Telephone Co. v. Blount, Fla.1960, 124 So. 2d 706, where there had been no award of other benefits made to the claimant. However, it is patent that the reason therefor was the fact there had been no claim filed. It is interesting to note, as revealed by the record on file with this Court, that the…