JOHN B. DICKEY, APPELLANT,

v.

FINE FOODS OPERATING COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Linning v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Duval Cnty., 176 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
  …36.09, 336.10, F.S.A. . Brooks-Garrison Hotel Corp. et al. v. Sara Inv. Co. et al., (Fla.1952) 61 So. 2d 913. . Wedmer et al. v. Escambia Chemical Corporation et al., (Fla.App.1958) 102 So. 2d 631. . Dan Dee Corporation v. Samuels, (Fla.App.1960) 124 So. 2d 733. . Daugherty v. Latham, 128 Fla. 271, 174 So. 417.…
• SUN OIL Co. v. Gerstein, 206 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
  …e: O’Dell v. Walsh, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 554; Brooks-Garrison Hotel Corp. v. Sara Inv. Co., Fla.1952, 61 So. 2d 913; Linning v. Board of County Commissioners of Duval County, Fla.App.1965, 176 So. 2d 350; Dan Dee Corporation v. Samuels, Fla.App.1960, 124 So. 2d 733; Wedner v. Escambia Chemical Corporation, supra. However, this point was never presented before the trial court, and in view of our prior conclusions, we deem it sufficient to state that appellees have not shown that the exercise of the city's autho…
• Freeman v. Burton Dyal McINTOSH, Jr., 338 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
  …own. O’Dell et al. v. Walsh, 81 So. 2d 554, 555 (Fla.1955); Brooks-Garison Hotel Corp. v. Sara Inv. Co., 61 So. 2d 913, 915 (Fla.1952). The application of the “complete enjoyment rule” in no way diminishes this requirement. Dan Dee Corp. v. Samuels, 124 So. 2d 733 (2nd D.C.A.Fla.1960), in fact, the Supreme Court in Brooks-Garison Hotel Corp., supra, after specifically discussing the “complete enjoyment” rule, went on to hold: This court is committed to the rule that an action by an individual to enforce his…

Authorities Cited

• W. J. Kiely & Co., Inc. v. Dickey, 124 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)