PENNYMAC CORP.
v.
OCEAN PLACE AT SILVER BEACH ASSOC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party waives its arguments on appeal when it fails to appear or contest relief sought prior to issuance of a final order, even if served with process in the underlying lawsuit.
[1] A party waives arguments for appellate review by failing to appear or contest relief sought at a hearing prior to issuance of a final order, regardless of prior service o…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePennymac was served with process in the underlying lawsuit and later served with a post-judgment motion to establish an equitable lien. A hearing was …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Post-Judgment Motions cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
PENNYMAC CORP.,
Appellant,
v.
OCEAN PLACE AT SILVER BEACH ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation; and FPR FORCE, LLC,
a Florida Limited Liability Company,
Appellees.
No. 4D17-0452
[January 10, 2018]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John B. Bowman, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE15-004725 (02).
Alexzander D. Gonano of Gonano & Harrell, Fort Pierce, and Avri S. Ben-Hamo and Steven B. Greenfield of Aldridge & Pite, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellant.
Christopher B. Hopkins and Debra Dominguez of McDonald Hopkins, LLC, West Palm Beach, and Harold B. Klite Truppman and Eli L. Samet of Harold B. Klite Truppman, P.A. Miami, for appellee, FPR Force, LLC.
PER CURIAM.
Pennymac appeals the circuit court’s order denying its “petition for relief from order appointing receiver and motion for rehearing.” Pennymac was served with process in the underlying lawsuit and was later served with a post-judgment motion to establish equitable lien. A hearing was held on the post-judgment motion, but Pennymac did not appear. Pennymac’s first appearance in the lawsuit did not occur until it sought relief from the final post-judgment order at issue. Therefore, Pennymac waived its arguments by failing to contest the relief sought prior to issuance of the final order. Due to Pennymac’s waiver, we need not address the merits of the issues it raises on appeal and specifically decline to do so.
2
Affirmed. WARNER, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.