DALLAS SEYMOUR
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court properly denied the defendant's Rule 3.850 motion.
Dallas Seymour appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
DALLAS SEYMOUR,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D16-3815
[January 11, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David A. Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-9529 CF10A.
Dallas Seymour, Crawfordville, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McVAY v. W. Plains Serv. Corp., 823 F.2d 1395 (10th Cir. 1987)…is unnecessary to review the district court’s alternative finding that this constituted a resulting trust. However, that ruling also appears to be correct. See Nussbacher v. Manderfeld, 64 Wyo. 55, 186 P. 2d 548 (1947); Dern v. Hitshew, 44 Wyo. 190, 9 P. 2d 467 (1932).…