JORGE PIEKAREWICZ AND J. D. RAYBURN
v.
KILLEARN HOMES ASSOC., INC., PALMETTO ETC.

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-01-30
No. 16-4799
Carnes, Marcus, Martin
239 So. 3d 1190 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

The trial court's decision is affirmed.

Facts & Procedural History

Jorge Piekarewicz and J. D. Rayburn appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Leon County involving Killearn Homes Association, Inc., United Nati…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D16-4799 _____________________________ JORGE PIEKAREWICZ and J. D. RAYBURN,

Appellants,

v. KILLEARN HOMES ASSOCIATION, INC., UNITED NATIONAL BANK, and PALMETTO CLUB PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James O. Shelfer, Judge. January 31, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, MAKAR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Mark G. Lawson and James C. Dinkins, Mark G. Lawson, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants. Daniel E. Manausa, Manausa Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Bradford, 830 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2016)
    …otions, it applies only to claims actually raised in a § 2255 motion in the district court, not claims repeatedly raised in applications for certification by this Court to file a successive § 2255 motion. See In re Anderson, 829 F. 3d 1290, 1294-97, 2016 WL 3947746, at *4-5 (11th Cir. 2016); see also In re Clayton, 829 F. 3d 1254, 1266, 2016 WL 3878156, at *9 (11th Cir.2016). Yet, as cogently and persuasively explained in Baptiste, the above argument fails on both counts. See Baptiste, 2016 WL 3752118, at *2.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw