J. B. CRAWFORD
v.
A. AUSTIN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this replevin case, the Florida Supreme Court held that a proper replevin bond—given in at least double the sworn value of the property—is an essential legal requirement. Because Austin's bond was for only $75, matching the sworn value rather than double that amount, the judgment in his favor was quashed.
A proper replevin bond given in at least double the sworn value of the property is an essential requirement of law to support a replevin proceeding and warrant judgment in the plaintiff's favor. Austin's bond, being only equal to the sworn value rather than double it, failed to comply with this mandatory requirement.
“A proper replevin bond, duly given according to the requirements of Section 5335, C. G. L., supra, in at least "double" the sworn value of the property to be replevied, is an essential requirement of law in order to support a replevin proceeding in plaintiff's behalf or warrant a judgment in his favor against the defendant.”
Establishes that a bond in double the property's sworn value is mandatory, not discretionary, for a valid replevin action.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAustin brought a replevin action in Justice of the Peace Court for the Fourth District of Duval County to recover a Chevrolet coupe with truck body. H…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Austin brought an action for replevin in the Justice of the Peace Court for the Fourth District of Duval County. His sworn affidavit made under Section 5334, C. G. L., 3481, R. G. S., fixed the value of the replevied Chevrolet coupe with truck body attached at $75.00. But the replevin bond he gave in the case was likewise for the penal sum of $75.00 and not for the sum of $150.00 (double the sworn value of the property). Hence, plaintiff’s bond was not given according to Section 5335, C. G. L., 3482 R. G. S., which mandatorily requires the plaintiff in a replevin case to give a bond in “at least” double the sworn value of the property to be replevied.
Upon appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor the judgment of the justice of the peace court was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Duval County, to which last mentioned judgment of the Circuit Court this Court issued its writ of certiorari, which is now before us for consideration.
- A proper replevin bond, duly given according to the requirements of Section 5335, C. G. L., supra, in at least “double” the sworn value of the property to be replevied, is an essential requirement of law in order to support a replevin proceeding in plaintiff’s behalf or warrant a judgment in his favor against the defendant. In the present ■case the record conclusively demonstrates that this essential requirement of the law was not observed. So the judgment of the justice of the peace court, as affirmed by the circuit *535court’s judgment to which this writ of certiorari is directed, should be quashed. Such will be our order in this case, without prejudice to amendments and further appropriate proceedings in the justice court upon remand of the record to that court.
Judgment of circuit court affirming justice court quashed.
Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.