GUTIERREZ
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Heggs, which struck down the 1995 sentencing guidelines as unconstitutional, does not apply to a defendant sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender because such offenders are statutorily exempt from the sentencing guidelines.
[1] A defendant sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender under section 775.084(4)(e), Florida Statutes, is exempted from the sentencing guidelines and therefore is not…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGutierrez committed crimes on February 20, 1997, within the period covered by Heggs (October 1, 1995 to May 24, 1997), and was sentenced as a habitual…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Article Iii, Section 6 Of The Florida Constitution cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed February 7, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-2673 Lower Tribunal No. 97-6088A
________________
Alex Gutierrez,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark Blumstein, Judge.
Alex Gutierrez, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and LUCK, JJ.
EMAS, J.
Alex Gutierrez appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. Gutierrez contends that his habitual violent felony offender sentences are illegal under Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)1 and that his crimes were committed on February 20, 1997, within the Heggs window.2
While Gutierrez is correct that he committed his crimes within the Heggs window, he is incorrect in asserting that the sentences are illegal, because Heggs is inapplicable to a defendant who was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender.
Section 775.084(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1994), which provision existed prior to the unconstitutional 1995 amendments to the sentencing guidelines, provided that a defendant who is sentenced as a habitual felony offender or a habitual violent felony offender is not subject to the sentencing guidelines provisions of section 921.001, Florida Statutes. Therefore, the 1995 sentencing guidelines, and the Heggs decision striking down those guidelines as unconstitutional, has no application to the non-guidelines sentences imposed on Gutierrez in the instant case. De La Rosa v. State, 979 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that the
Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Heggs does not affect a defendant who was properly sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender); Stanley v. State, 947 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (holding that defendant’s sentence was not illegal under Heggs where defendant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender);
Jefferson v. State, 826 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (affirming denial of a
Heggs challenge to the legality of a sentence where defendant designated and sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Xzavier Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2000)
- DE LA Rosa v. State, 979 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)
- Jefferson v. State, 826 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Wilcox v. State, 947 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)