ROSE GIORDANO, APPELLANT,
v.
MARIO GIORDANO, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1961-02-06
No. 59-720
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
126 So. 2d 602 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1961)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*603PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, husband, was granted a decree of divorce and the defendant and counterclaimant, wife, appealed. Each party charged the other with desertion. Because of the involved factual background which covered the actions of the parties during a thirty-year period, the case presents some difficulty. However, upon review, the ultimate question is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the decree and we conclude that the evidence viewed in its most favorable light can be so construed. E.g., Schuberth v. Schuberth, Fla.1951, 52 So.2d 332; Monsalvatge v. Monsalvatge, 153 Fla. 763, 15 So.2d 838.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw