HAROLD VINEBERG, STANLEY PEAL AND PETER DEMET, APPELLANTS,

v.

DIXIE STYLE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Drake v. SUN Bank & Tr. Co. OF ST. Petersburg, 377 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  …event, liability will exist only where the likelihood of the misconduct and the unreasonable risk of it outweighs the burden of protecting against it. The few Florida cases on the subject are consistent with these principles. In Murray v. Osenton, 126 So. 2d 603 (Fla.2d DCA 1961), our court held that the owner of a service station was not liable for the shooting of one of its employees during the course of a nighttime robbery. Allegations that the defendant knew of the likelihood of service station robberie…
• Colton v. The Great Atl. & Pac. TEA Co., Inc., 136 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …rette rack atop the cash register was obvious to the plaintiff as it would have been to anyone of ordinary senses. It is the duty of an employer to provide his employees with a reasonably safe place in which to work. Murray v. Osenton, Fla.App.1961, 126 So. 2d 603. It is also the rule, however, that an employer is not required to warrant an employee absolute safety under every condition. Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Gentry, Fla. 1950, 46 So. 2d 485. In the instant case all essential facts were beyond dispute…
• Bing v. Alachua Cnty., 392 So. 3d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)

Authorities Cited

• Barnard Kendig v. Giles, 9 Fla. 278 (Fla. 1860)