AARON HAMILTON
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's disposition on a Rule 3.800 motion was affirmed because it was supported by applicable precedent.
Aaron Hamilton filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800 challenging some aspect of his conviction in Marion County Circuit Court.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
AARON HAMILTON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-3579 CORRECTED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
________________________________
Opinion filed February 27, 2018 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Anthony M. Tatti, Judge. Aaron Hamilton, Cross City, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Rusaw v. State, 451 So. 2d 469, 470 (Fla. 1984); State v. Young, 579 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). TORPY, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Rusaw v. State, 451 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Young, 579 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)