JASON TOLBERT
v.
LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An order denying a motion for telephonic hearing is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order and therefore does not confer appellate jurisdiction.
[1] An order denying a motion for telephonic hearing is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order under Florida law and therefore does not confer appellate juri…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant Tolbert sought appellate review of a trial court order denying his motion for telephonic hearing in a case against Lakeview Loan Servicing, …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
February 28, 2018 PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion for telephonic hearing. The order is not a final order or an appealable, non-final order. Accordingly, Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. WETHERELL, ROWE, and JAY, JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.