EDWARD MCNAIR, APPELLANT,
v.
DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND RICHARD E. GERSTEIN, STATE ATTORNEY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1961-02-16
No. 60-236
PEARSON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and SAULS, RICHARD M., Associate Judge, concur.
127 So. 2d 142 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A declaratory decree proceeding cannot be used to enjoin an ongoing criminal proceeding.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff filed a bill for declaratory decree challenging the legality of his arrest for violating a county traffic ordinance. The trial court dismiss…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Edward McNair brought a bill for declaratory decree in the circuit court. After alleging that he had been arrested by a police officer of the City of Miami, for the violation of a Metropolitan Dade County traffic ordinance, he posed the question to the court of the legality of his arrest. Upon hearing, the chancellor entered a final decree, which in effect dismissed plaintiff’s complaint but also set forth conclusions as to the respective rights of the parties.

An examination of the record discloses that the order of dismissal should be sustained upon the ground that a proceeding for a declaratory decree or judgment may not be used to enjoin a criminal proceeding in progress. Taylor v. Cooper, Fla.1952, 60 So.2d 534.

Accordingly, the final decree is affirmed in its dismissal of appellant’s petition for declaratory decree, hut modified by eliminating therefrom the findings and conclusions set out in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 thereof.

Modified and affirmed.

PEARSON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and SAULS, RICHARD M., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw