TROPICAL CHEVROLET, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
G. A. C. FINANCE CORPORATION OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
TROPICAL CHEVROLET, INC., APPELLANT,
G. A. C. FINANCE CORPORATION OF MIAMI, APPELLEE
127 So. 2d 476
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1961)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of G.F.C. Corporation v. Spradlin, Fla. 1949, 38 So.2d 679, without prejudice to appellant to demand payment out of any excess proceeds of sale of the automobile by appellee. See Intertype Corporation v. Pulver, 101 Fla. 1176, 1180, 132 So. 830, 135 So. 793; Id., D.C.S.D. Fla.1932, 2 F.Supp. 4; Id., 5 Cir., 1933, 65 F.2d 419; Colonial Finance, Inc. v. All Miami Ford, Inc., Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 857.
HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Vitt v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc., 340 So. 2d 962 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…o. 2d 543 (Fla.lst DCA 1966). Our reading of these cases and those cited by the appellee convinces us that the best stated rule for the admissibility of evidence of an experiment and its subsequent appellate review is set forth in Huff v. Belcastro, 127 So. 2d 476, 479 (Fla.3d DCA 1961), where Chief Judge Horton, speaking for the court, in reversing a judgment based upon a directed verdict for the defendants, stated the basis for the admission of experiment evidence as follows: ije % sfc sfc sk sk “However,…
-
Connolly v. Wiley C. Steakley, 197 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1967)…48, 159 Fla. 890, 33 So. 2d 48; Poindexter v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., Fla.1951, 56 So. 2d 905; Rosenfeld v. Knowlton, Fla.App.1959, 110 So. 2d 90; Royal Kitchen Cabinet Corp. v. Palcic, Fla.App.1959, 111 So. 2d 42; Huff v. Belcastro, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 476; Holdsworth v. Crews, Fla.App.1961, 129 So. 2d 153, and Springer v. Morris, Fla.1954, 74 So. 2d 781. It would unduly extend an already lengthy opinion to attempt any analysis of the individual cases just cited. Suffice it to say, therefore, that to…
-
Ardell v. Milner, 166 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)…at the time of the entry of the directed verdict, resolving all inferences in favor of the party moved against in accordance with the applicable principles [see: Teare v. Local Union No. 295, Fla.1957, 98 So. 2d 79; Huff v. Belcastro, Fla.App.1961, 127 So. 2d 476; Farber v. Houston Corporation, Fla.App.1963, 150 So. 2d 732], reveals the following: That the parties had a written lease and the tenant took possession. Subsequently, because the landlord failed to supply adequate air conditioning and other servic…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Intertype Corp. v. Pulver, 132 So. 830 (Fla. 1931)
- G.F.C. Corp. v. Spradlin, 38 So.2d 679 (Fla. 1949)
- Intertype Corp. v. Pulver, 65 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1933)
- Colonial Fin., Inc. v. ALL Miami Ford, Inc., 112 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)