CHRISTOPHER RINGENBERG
v.
STEPHANIE DAYLE RINGENBERG

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-03-08
No. 17-1577
237 So. 3d 1173 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An award of attorney's fees in a family law case is reversible error when the trial court fails to determine the recipient's financial need and the payor's ability to pay prior to making the award.


Headnotes

[1] An award of attorney's fees in family law proceedings must be preceded by findings regarding the recipient's financial need and the payor's ability to pay.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the trial court did not determine appellee's need or appellant's ability to pay prior to deciding that appellee was entitled to fees”

Explanation of why the attorney's fees award was reversed.

Facts & Procedural History

Christopher Ringenberg appealed from a circuit court judgment that awarded attorney's fees to his former spouse and denied his motion to disqualify th…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

March 8, 2018 PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to appellee and the trial court’s order denying his motion to disqualify their child’s counselor. We reverse the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees because the trial court did not determine appellee’s need or appellant’s ability to pay prior to deciding that appellee was entitled to fees. Routh v. Thompson, 82 So. 3d 157, 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to disqualify the child’s counselor without comment.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART. B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and RAY, JJ., concur.

2

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw