IN RE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES
IN RE FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES
127 So. 2d 668
Florida Supreme Court (1961)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Court Administration cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
Florida Appellate Rules, Rule 2.1, subd. a(4) (i), 31 F.S.A., be and the same is hereby amended by striking therefrom the word “such” in the proviso appearing in the first paragraph of said rule so that said proviso, as hereby amended, shall read as follows, to-wit:
“ * * * provided, further, that if there be no available and qualified judge of said justice of the peace court, small claims court, juvenile court or traffic court, the chief justice may assign a judge of another such court of the same or greater jurisdiction to perform the duties of the judge of said court for such time as he may direct.”
This amendment shall take effect upon its being filed in the Clerk’s office.
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Rose, 187 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 1966)…t seasonal advice on the outcome of the cause, however, he only recommended a private reprimand by the [*333] circuit court. The hoard directed suspension from practice for three months upon this count. In State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Hogsten, Fla., 127 So. 2d 668, the respondent advised his client that his divorce suit was completed and that he was free to remarry, which was false. The referee recommended suspension for one year, the hoard reduced the suspension to six months, and the court ordered suspensio…
-
In re Florida Appellate Rules, 132 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 1961)…PER CURIAM. Rule 2.1, subd. a (4) (i), Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., as amended by that certain order dated July 9, 1958, published in Fla., 112 So. 2d 380, and as further amended by that certain order dated March 8, 1961, published in Fla., 127 So. 2d 668, be and the same is hereby amended by striking all of present Rule 2.1, subd. a (4) (i) and inserting in lieu thereof the following to be known as Rule 2.1, subd. a (4) (i), viz.: “(i) When the judge of any small claims court, juvenile court or tra…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Headley, 475 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. 1985)…n actively engaged in Alcoholics Anonymous in an attempt to put his life back together. The Bar contends that we should not consider alcoholism as a mitigating circumstance since it occurred after the wrongful conduct. See State ex rel. v. Hogsten, 127 So. 2d 668 (Fla.1961) (alcoholism or illness is not relevant for consideration as mitigating circumstances when it occurs after the wrongful event). However, we accept the referee’s finding that Mr. Headley’s failure to pay bar dues was a direct result of his…
Authorities Cited
- In re Florida Appellate Rules, 112 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 1959)