ARMSTRONG
v.
STATE
ARMSTRONG
STATE
245 So. 3d 711
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court’s order of final judgment entered upon a directed verdict for Carolina Casualty Insurance Company upon a holding that the testimony of the expert for Charles Wallace, d/b/a Wallace Trucking Company [Wallace], was sufficient to raise a jury question as to whether the damage to the engine of Wallace’s truck was caused by “mischief or vandalism” within the meaning of the insurance policy. Cf. Forshee v. Peninsular Life Insurance Co., 370 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Dent v. Casale, 358 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 365 So. 2d 710 (Fla.1978); Sparks v. Ober, 216 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- LEE v. State, 939 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Chase v. State, 60 So. 3d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
- Pillajo v. State, 60 So. 3d 565 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)