KHAMBREL L. HADLEY
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court must enter an amended final judgment and sentence incorporating the sentencing corrections identified in its June 20, 2017 order, and all other issues on appeal are affirmed.
[1] When a trial court grants a defendant's motion to correct sentencing errors but fails to enter an amended judgment reflecting those corrections, an appellate court must r…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The State concedes that the court should have entered an amended judgment. Our review of the trial court records confirms that no amended judgment has been entered.”
Explaining why remand was necessary to effectuate the trial court's sentencing corrections.
Appellant Khambrel L. Hadley appealed his conviction, raising multiple issues including sentencing errors. The trial court issued an order on June 20,…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Amended Final Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. We agree that the trial court should enter an amended final judgment and sentence incorporating the changes identified in the trial court’s order of June 20, 2017, granting Appellant’s motion to correct sentencing errors. We remand this matter for that purpose.1 After careful consideration, we affirm as to all other issues raised in this appeal without further discussion.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED JUDGMENT.
PALMER, WALLIS, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. 1 The State concedes that the court should have entered an amended judgment. Our review of the trial court records confirms that no amended judgment has been entered.