HAROLD G. REDSTONE
v.
STATE
HAROLD G. REDSTONE
STATE
116 Fla. 2
Florida Supreme Court (1934)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 156 So. 235
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The only question presented in this case which appears to have any merit is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.
The evidence might have been much stronger and more satisfactory, but we cannot say that there was not substantial evidence establishing the guilt of the accused. The jury deemed it to be so and the trial judge with all the facts and circumstances before him so ruled in passing on motion for new trial. Therefore, the judgment should be affirmed and it. is so ordered.-
Affirmed.
*3Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
Davis, C. J., not participating.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Se. Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Transit Homes, Inc., 192 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…000.00. The position of Meros as trustee is 'that of a stakeholder, and his liability to the plaintiff can only he up to the amount he was holding. Reaves v. Domestic Finance Company, 1934, 113 Fla. 672, 152 So. 718; pet. for reh. den. 116 Fla. 22, 156 So. 235. The balance of the amount found by the chancellor to he due the plaintiff should Re borne by the corporate defendant alone and appropriate decree entered against it, plus interest. The question now recurs: whether or ■not, since the sum of $3,000…