JAMES GORDON GASKILL, APPELLANT,
v.
EDITH MONTAGUE AND JAMES F. MONTAGUE, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1961-04-06
No. 60-521
HORTON, C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and SMITH, D. R., Associate Judge, concur.
128 So. 2d 420 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1961) Negative Treatment
Cited by 28 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court reversed an order granting a new trial because the trial court failed to state the grounds for granting the new trial as required by Florida statute and rule. The appellate court directed that final judgment be entered for the party who obtained the jury verdict.


Holding

Yes, the trial court erred by granting a new trial without stating the grounds for its decision. The appellate court reversed the order granting the new trial.


Key Quotes

“In this action for damages for personal injuries a jury verdict rendered for the defendant was set aside and plaintiffs' motion for new trial was granted.”

Describes the procedural posture of the case at the trial court level.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

A jury returned a verdict for the defendants in a personal injury action. The trial court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a new trial but did not s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
'PER CURIAM.

'PER CURIAM.

In this action for damages for personal injuries a jury verdict rendered for the defendant was set aside and plaintiffs’ motion for new trial was granted. No grounds were stated in the order, as they are required to be by § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A. Defendant’s appeal assigned as error the failure of the order granting new trial to state any grounds therefor. See Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240.

The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions, as provided for in said § 59.04, id., “that final judgment be entered in the trial court for the party obtaining the verdict, unless motion in arrest of judgment or for judgment non obstante veredicto be made and prevail.”

Reversed and remanded.

HORTON, C. J., CARROLL, CHAS., J., and SMITH, D. R., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (28 total)

  • CAT 'N Fiddle, Inc. v. The Century Ins. Co., 213 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1968)
    …ce. Balancing the ease with which an insurer can adopt effective means to communicate such notice to the insured personally (see Service Fire Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Markey (Fla.1956), 83 So. 2d 855, and Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Simpson (Fla.App.1961), 128 So. 2d 420) against the serious nature of the risk created when the insurer chooses or relies on less direct methods of effecting notice of cancellation, public policy clearly commands a preference for the former. Accordingly, when an insurer chooses to rely o…
  • Sroczyk v. Fritz, 220 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 1969)
    …d error of the trial court must be made to affirmatively appear from the record. In the record before the district court there was no express ruling by the trial court on the motion to dismiss. In Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Simpson, Fla.App., 128 So. 2d 420, the defendant in the trial court filed a motion for summary judgment with accompanying affidavits. No order on this motion ap [*913] peared in the record, but the case was later tried and verdict and judgment rendered for plaintiff. On appeal the a…
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Dougherty, 197 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …ence of the receipt of” the notice by the insured. Bradley v. Associates Discount Corp., Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d. 857; Service Fire Insurance Co. of New York v. Markey, Fla.1955, 83 So. 2d 855; Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Simpson, Fla.App.1961, 128 So. 2d 420. Applying the principles of law enunciated', above to this case, it is readily apparent that the chancellor erred in his findings when:, he stated: “I think the burden was on the company • to do something to be sure that this-notice got to her — f…

Previewing 3 of 28 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw