KENNETH E. RICKERSON
v.
J. D. PEACOCK II CLERK OF COURT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-04-20
No. 17-3253
240 So. 3d 901 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

An appeal must be based on a final order from the trial court; where no final order has been entered, the appellant must first request entry of a final order.


Headnotes

[1] An appeal must be based on a final order from the trial court; where no final order has been entered, the proper course is to request entry of a final order in the trial…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Kenneth E. Rickerson appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. No final order had been entered by the trial court.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

April 20, 2018 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Augustin v. Blount, 573 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (noting that the Appellant’s proper course is to request entry of a final order which may be appealed). WOLF, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw