MARY E. EMILE, APPELLANT,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an appeal from a summary judgment. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment, finding that the principles of law established in a prior, similar case controlled the outcome.
No, the summary judgment was not proper. The principles of law announced in the prior case, Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, supra, control the outcome.
“This' appeal is from a summary judgment entered adverse to the appellant.”
Establishes the nature of the appeal and the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe facts of this case are identical to a prior case, Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, 126 So. 2d 305. The prior case's decision was not availab…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Controlling Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
This' appeal is from a summary judgment entered adverse to the appellant. The facts in this case are similar, if not identical, to those in the case of Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1961, 126 So.2d 305. It should be noted that the decision by this court in the former case was not available to the trial judge at the time of the entry of the summary judgment in the case at bar. Likewise, it should be observed that counsel fer the appellee, with commendable candor, conceded at oral argument before this court that the principles of law involved in the prior case appeared to be controlling in the instant case.
We have reviewed the record, as well as our prior decision, and conclude that this case is. controlled by the . principles announced in Emile v. First National Bank of Miami, supra. Accordingly, the summary judgment appealed should be and it is hereby reversed.
Reversed.
PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ-, concur.