HARRY WOLFF, APPELLANT,
v.
E. W. KIMBALL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1961-05-15
No. 60-474
130 So. 2d 902 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McCREARY v. Dade Cnty., 18 Fla. Supp. 172 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1961)
    …dings” to review a comity zoning matter. This is supported by the same district court’s per curiam affirmance, without opinion, of this court’s (Judge Crawford, file no. 60 L 591) order dismissing petition for certiorari in Litowitz v. Dade County, 130 So. 2d 902. I therefore agree with Judge Crawford’s decision that chapter 176, Florida Statutes, entitled “Municipal Zoning,” interpreted in Josephson v. Autrey (Fla. Sup. Ct. 1957), 96 So. 2d 784, is not applicable to Dade County, and that one is not entitled…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw