FRANK H. LOGAN

v.

WILSON CYPRESS CO., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Balding v. Fleisher, 279 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
  …Appellees, as purchasers of the property at a judicial sale, are generally subject to the doctrine of caveat emptor. As such, the purchaser at a sheriff’s sale acquires only just such interest as the debt- or may have in the land. Bradley v. Forbs, 116 Fla. 350, 156 So. 716; Gracy v. Fielding, 71 Fla. 1, 70 So. 625. As was previously noted, the interest of the judgment debtor herein, the appellant wife, was an estate by the entireties and not capable of being the object of satisfaction for the debt of one…
• Flagship State Bank OF Jacksonville v. Costa Carantzas, 352 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …5 (1894). Because of the invalidity Carantzas acquired only the interest of a judgment debt- or whose interest was subject to Flagship’s prior liens. Wildwood Crate and Ice Company v. Citizens Bank, 98 Fla. 186, 123 So. 699 (1929); Bradley v. Forbs, 116 Fla. 350, 156 So. 716 (1934). Carantzas states in his brief that the property sold to him has since been sold to other persons, although this is not established in the record. If this is so, Flagship has, as indicated in Love, Sheriff v. Williams, supra, a…
• JP Morgan Chase for Residential Funding Corp. v. NEW Millennial, LC, 6 So. 3d 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …“[w]hile each subsequent assignment had a bearing on the rights of the mortgagees inter se, it did not affect the rights or interests of the debtor or the debtor’s [successor]....” Id. at 1339.' As pointed out in In re Halabi, in Bradley v. Forbs, 116 Fla. 350, 156 So. 716 (1934), the Florida Supreme Court held that the predecessor of section 701.02 applied only to creditors or subsequent purchasers of a mortgagee. In re Halabi, 184 F. 3d at 1338 n. 1. The court in Bradley explained: [Wjhen the original…