WORTHY MOSES MCCULLOUGH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant states a facially sufficient claim of ineffective assistance when he identifies an alibi witness, specifies her testimony, alleges her availability at trial, and shows prejudice from counsel's failure to call her.
[1] A defendant alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to call a witness states a facially sufficient claim when he identifies the witness by name, specifies…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the mere existence of evidence of guilt is insufficient to conclusively rebut a claim of ineffectiveness in failing to present evidence of innocence in the form of known and available alibi witnesses”
The court explaining the prejudice standard for alibi witness claims in the context of ineffective assistance
McCullough was convicted of crimes and filed a Rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. He claimed trial counsel failed to call h…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Alibi Witness cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM. Worthy McCullough appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion following an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, McCullough alleged seven grounds for relief, but he appeals the trial court’s denial of grounds two and five only. With respect to ground five, we affirm without comment.
In ground two, which was summarily denied prior to the evidentiary hearing, McCullough alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call McCullough’s grandmother, Ruby Wright, as an alibi witness. He claimed that Ms. Wright would have testified that McCullough was at home with her when the crimes in this case were committed. He also alleged that she was available to testify at the time of his trial.
We conclude that McCullough stated a facially sufficient claim based on counsel’s alleged failure to call a witness because he: (i) identified the witness; (ii) specified the content of her testimony; (iii) alleged that she was
2
available to testify at trial; and (iv) sufficiently alleged that failure to call her to testify resulted in prejudice. Youmans v. State, 222 So. 3d 1, 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). With respect to prejudice, we note that “the mere existence of evidence of guilt is insufficient to conclusively rebut a claim of ineffectiveness in failing to present evidence of innocence in the form of known and available alibi witnesses.” Jacobs v. State, 880 So. 2d 548, 555 (Fla. 2004).
Accordingly, we affirm as to ground five and reverse as to ground two with instructions for the trial court to either attach records conclusively refuting McCullough’s claim or, in the alternative, conduct an evidentiary hearing.
Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part. CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kennon v. State, 261 So. 3d 755 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
-
Holland v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
-
Beer v. State (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Alwin J. Jacobs v. State, 880 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2004)
- Jarett Youmans v. State, 222 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)