SWANICK
v.
LORISH
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court must conduct a proper constitutional inquiry before imposing restrictions on the dissemination of probate case contents.
[1] A trial court must conduct a proper constitutional inquiry before imposing restrictions on a party's ability to disseminate or communicate the contents of court filings a…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We reverse the portion of the order that prohibits Swanick or her agents from disseminating, publishing or communicating, in any form whatsoever, contents of the probate case and all related matters because the trial court failed to conduct a proper constitutional inquiry.”
Statement of disposition and reasoning
Cindy Swanick, individually and as personal representative of her mother's estate, appealed an order granting her former attorney's motion to strike i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Cindy Swanick, individually and as personal representative for Gwendolyn Harvey-Hamp, appeals an order granting a motion to strike filed by Lorenzo Ramunno, Esq.,
Swanick's former attorney, in Swanick's mother's probate case. We reverse the portion of the order that prohibits Swanick or her agents from disseminating, publishing or communicating, in any form whatsoever, contents of the probate case and all related matters because the trial court failed to conduct a proper constitutional inquiry. See Fox v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condo. Ass'n, 223 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). The order is affirmed in all other respects.1
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- FOX v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 223 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)