ART PRESENT, DOING BUSINESS AS ART PRESENT REAL ESTATE, APPELLANT,

v.

HARRY KLUBECK AND LOTTIE KLUBECK, HIS WIFE; WILLIAM STONE AND LILLIAN STONE, HIS WIFE; HOWARD KLUBECK AND PENNY KLUBECK, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Butts v. Dragstrem, 349 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …, concurs. SMITH, J., dissents. . Oceanic Villas, Inc. v. Godson, 148 Fla. 454, 4 So. 2d 689 (1941). . Citizens’ State Bank v. Jones, 100 Fla. 1492, 131 So. 369 (1930). . Morris v. Ingraffia, 154 Fla. 432, 18 So. 2d 1 (1944). . Kaminsky v. Wye, 132 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1961). . Farnham v. Blount, 152 Fla. 208, 11 So. 2d 785 (1942); Beagie v. Bagwell, 169 So. 2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). . Beagle v. Bagwell, 215 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). . Dale v. Jennings, 90 Fla. 234, 107 So. 175 (1925). . Sm…
• Hamill v. Miodonski, 182 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Kaminsky v. Wye, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 44; Diaz v. Keyes Company, Fla.App.1962, 143 So. 2d 554.…
• Diaz v. The Keyes Co., 143 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
  …ty in behalf of the purchasers (b) the Sec [*555] ond Amended Complaint does not sufficiently state a cause of action in tort for deceit, see Potakar v. Hurtak (S.Ct.Fla., Sept. 23, 1955) 82 So. 2d 502; Kaminsky v. Wye (2d Dist., Fla. July 26, 1961) 132 So. 2d 44; and’(c) the Second Amended Complaint shows that the plaintiffs failed to use due diligence for their own protection, see Williams v. McFadden (S.Ct.Fla., Feb. 28, 1887) [23 Fla. 143], 1 So. 618; Glass et al v. Craig, et al (S.Ct.Fla., March 22, 192…

Authorities Cited

• Shuler v. Allen, 76 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 1955)