SHERMYKAEL JENKINS, SR.
v.
DEANDRA LEEANN GOODMAN
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A domestic violence injunction is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540(b) when appeal grounds do not establish reversible error but may provide grounds for such relief.
[1] A domestic violence injunction may be affirmed on appeal without prejudice to the appellant filing a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Family Law Rule of Proc…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJenkins was subject to a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. He filed a pro se motion for rehearing or appeal, whic…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Burden Of Proof In Tax Assessment Challenges cases and more on FLexlaw
SILBERMAN, Judge.
After a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence was entered against him, Shermykael Juanius Jenkins filed a pro se "Motion for
Rehearing or Appeal" which the trial court treated as Jenkins' notice of appeal. In his motion for rehearing or appeal and in this court, Jenkins alleged grounds that do not establish reversible error but may provide for relief from judgment under Florida Family
Law Rule of Procedure 12.540(b). Rather than relinquish jurisdiction for the trial court to consider those grounds, we affirm without prejudice to Jenkins filing a motion for relief from judgment under rule 12.540(b) within thirty days of mandate. See Armbruster v.
Amber Int'l Corp., 416 So. 2d 1220, 1221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Glatstein v. City of Miami,
391 So. 2d 297, 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
CASANUEVA and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Straughn v. Harlan Tuck and Florence P. Tuck, 354 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1977)
- Powell v. J. R. Kelly as Tax Collector of Bradford Cnty., 223 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1969)
- Blake v. Xerox Corp., 447 So. 2d 1348 (Fla. 1984)
- Glatstein v. The City OF Miami, 391 So. 2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Armbruster v. Amber Int'l Corp., 416 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)