ROGERS
v.
STATE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2018-05-30
No. 3D17–1299
Adkins, Boyd, Ehlrich, McDonald, Overton, Shaw
245 So. 3d 1007 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2018)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A trial court must issue a written order of violation of probation that contains the evidence and grounds necessary to support revocation.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court must issue a written order of violation of probation containing the evidence and grounds necessary to support revocation of probation.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Anthony Rogers was convicted and sentenced based on a finding of violation of probation. The trial court did not issue a written order of violation of…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

*1008Anthony Rogers appeals from his conviction and sentence pursuant to a finding of violation of probation. Both parties agree that, because the trial court did not issue a written order of violation of probation stating the evidence and grounds for revocation, the case must be remanded with directions to render a written order of probation.

We therefore remand to the trial court solely to provide a written order of violation of probation that contains the evidence and grounds necessary to support revocation of Rogers' probation.

Remanded with instructions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw