TRENTAIR LAVENT BINGHAM
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Trentair Lavent Bingham appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The opinion does not detail the underlying facts.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Legal Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge.
Trentair Lavent Bingham, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Wayne, 531 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 1988); Bilyou v.
State, 404 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1981); State v. Segarra, 388 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1980);
Broughton v. State, 929 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Mearns v. State, 779 So. 2d
282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Paul v. State, 830 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- State v. Segarra, 388 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 1980)
- Bilyou v. State, 404 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1981)
- State v. Wayne, 531 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 1988)
- Tarance Baker v. State, 929 So. 2d 1130 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)